Rethinking protein futures: A conceptual framework for consumer attitude, subjective norms, sustainable eating psychology and culture

Elzė Rudienė; Gustė Skrickaitė; Patricija Jašinskaitė

doi:10.63775/bff5hb72

Authors

Elzė Rudienė Vilnius University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9326-5379
Gustė Skrickaitė Vilnius University Author
Patricija Jašinskaitė Vilnius University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63775/bff5hb72

Keywords:

alternative proteins, sustainable eating, consumer attitude, food psychology

Abstract

This conceptual study proposes an integrated framework linking consumer attitude, subjective norms, and sustainable eating psychology to explain acceptance of alternative proteins. Building on the Theory of Planned Behavior, it highlights how cognitive, emotional, and cultural factors jointly shape sustainable food choices. The model argues that social influence, moral identity, and environmental values interact to determine consumers’ openness toward novel protein sources. By synthesizing insights from sustainability, psychology, and food behavior research, the framework extends understanding beyond traditional behavioral prediction models. The study contributes theoretically by offering a holistic lens for future empirical research and practical strategies to promote sustainable protein adoption.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Akinmeye F., Chriki S., Liu C., Zhao J., Ghnimi S. (2024) What factors influence consumer attitudes towards alternative proteins? Food Humanit, 3:100349. doi: 10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100349

Amoneit M, Gellrich L, Weckowska DM. (2025). Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Exploring Determinants of the Consumer Willingness to Buy in Germany. Foods, 9;14(14):2427. doi: 10.3390/foods14142427. PMID: 40724248; PMCID: PMC12294508

Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2019). To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels. Food Quality and Preference, 77, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.002

Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2021). Consumer perceptions and acceptance of plant-based alternatives: The role of environmental concern and perceived efficacy. Food Quality and Preference, 94, 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104313

Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2021). Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy, 99, 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101974

Bryant, C., & Sanctorum, H. (2021). Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite, 161, 105161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161

Bryant, C., Anderson, J. E., Asher, K. E., Green, C., & Gasteratos, K. (2020). Strategies for communicating about cultured meat: Religious and ethical perspectives. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00070

Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2020). Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201

Bryant, C., Szejda, K., & Wise, J. (2021). Exploring global patterns in consumer acceptance of cultured meat: Cross-cultural evidence from 27 countries. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 686325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.686325

Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Deshpande, V., & Tse, B. (2019). A comparative study of consumer acceptance of cultured meat in the United States, China, and India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011

Camilleri, A. R., Larrick, R. P., Hossain, S., & Patino-Echeverri, D. (2021). Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z

Can, B., Majoo, F., & Öztürkcan, A. (2024). Consumer Acceptance, Attitude and Knowledge Studies on Alternative Protein Sources: Insight Review. Gıda, 49(4), 682-702.

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022

Crummett, D., Vancauwenberghe, L., et al. (2025). Beyond the buzz: Insect-based foods are unlikely to significantly reduce meat consumption. npj Sustainable Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00075-z

Choudhury, D., Tseng, T. W., & Swartz, E. (2020). The business of cultured meat. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(6), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.02.012

de Boer, J., Schösler, H., & Aiking, H. (2021). Cultural and social dynamics of meat reduction and substitution: The role of cognitive dissonance. Appetite, 163, 105229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105229

de Boer, J., Schösler, H., & Aiking, H. (2021). Motives for consumers’ plant-based eating: Development and validation of a measure. Food Quality and Preference, 91, 104201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104201

De Groeve, B., Bleys, B., & Hudders, L. (2023). The power of influencers: The impact of social media endorsements on sustainable food choices. Appetite, 181, 106361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106361

Dempsey, C., Bryant, C. J., & Barnett, J. (2023). The role of social norms and identity in consumer acceptance of cultivated meat: Cross-cultural insights. Food Quality and Preference, 108, 104876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104876

Dempsey, C., Bryant, C., & Onwezen, M. C. (2023). Cultural influences on the acceptance of alternative proteins: A cross-cultural perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 108, 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104891

Ditlevsen, K., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J. (2023). Cultural differences in moral motivations for sustainable eating: Comparing collectivist and individualist contexts. Appetite, 181, 106444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106444

Dupont, J., Fiebelkorn, F., & Hartmann, C. (2022). Social influence in sustainable food choices: How perceived social approval and descriptive norms affect plant-based eating. Appetite, 179, 106303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106303

Dupont, J., Fiebelkorn, F., & Verneau, F. (2022). Social influences on sustainable food choices: The role of perceived norms and social identity. Sustainability, 14(7), 4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074327

Dupont, J., Harms, T., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022). Acceptance of Cultured Meat in Germany-Application of an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030424

Fernández-Celemín, L., Sijtsema, S. J., & Fischer, A. R. H. (2022). Food neophobia and consumer perception of alternative proteins: A European perspective. Appetite, 174, 106001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106001

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security. Rome: FAO.

Graça, J. (2022). Meat, beyond the plate: Consumer attitudes toward meat alternatives and the role of identity. Appetite, 170, 105880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105880

Graça, J., Godinho, C. A., & Truninger, M. (2019). Redefining meat: Flexitarian shifts in the cultural meaning of meat. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12307

Graça, J., Oliveira, A., & Calheiros, M. M. (2019). Meat, morals, and motivations: The cognitive dissonance of sustainable meat consumption. Appetite, 141, 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104295

Hanboonsong, Y., Jamjanya, T., & Durst, P. B. (2013). Six-legged livestock: Edible insect farming, collecting and marketing in Thailand. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

Harvey, J., & Taheri, B. (2021). Moral obligation and sustainable food choice: Integrating moral norm theory with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04558-3

Heijnk, V., Espey, A., & Schuenemann, F. (2023). A comparison of influencing factors on attitudes towards plant-based, insect-based and cultured meat alternatives in Germany. Food Quality and Preference, 110, 104966.

Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2021). Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: Consumer perceptions and barriers in a cross-cultural context. Public Health Nutrition, 24(3), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020001465

Khan, S., Lee, M., & Kim, J. (2021). The moderating effect of collectivism on the relationship between subjective norms and green food consumption intention. Sustainability, 13(9), 4745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094745

Kwon, J., & Lee, H. (2023). Ethical consumption and the paradox of food technology: Consumer moral reasoning toward alternative proteins. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(4), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05287-8

Lazou, A., Tsakalidou, E., & Kapsokefalou, M. (2024). Cultured meat: A survey of awareness among Greek consumers. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 9(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2024021

Lupton, D., & Turner, B. (2023). Unfamiliar foods and imagined risks: The social psychology of alternative protein rejection. Food, Culture & Society, 26(2), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2022.2101745

Mancini, M. C., & Antonioli, F. (2022). Exploring consumers’ attitude toward cultivated meat in a cross-country context: The role of social norms and trust. Food Research International, 159, 111633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111633

Mancini, M. C., & Mayr, H. (2022). Acceptance of cultured meat in Germany: Application of an extended theory of planned behaviour. Foods, 11(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030424

Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E., & Mora, C. (2017). Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food quality and preference, 59, 27-34.

Miao, L., Mattila, A. S., & Mount, D. (2023). Moral identity and sustainable eating: How self-concept shapes food choice intentions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075764

Ong, K. J., Choudhury, D., & Naing, M. W. (2020). Cultured meat: Emerging nomenclature, consumer acceptance, and health concerns. Food Science and Human Wellness, 9(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2020.06.001

Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2021). A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite, 159, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058

Onwezen, M. C., van der Weele, C. N., van Leeuwen, E., Sijtsema, S. J., Dagevos, H., & Jasper, J. (2021). Consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: A systematic review of determinants and interventions. Appetite, 159, 105080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105080

Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption: The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011

Pronk, K., Etter, B., Michel, F., & Siegrist, M. (2025). Consumer acceptance of different protein sources for meat alternatives: A multinational study. Appetite, 215, 108246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108246

Reipurth, M. F. S., Hørby, L., Gregersen, C. G., Bonke, A., & Pérez-Cueto, F. J. (2019). Meat reduction and plant-based eating: The role of moral attitudes and food choice motives. Appetite, 141, 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104313

Rosenfeld, D. L. (2018). The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. Appetite, 131, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011

Rosenfeld, D. L., & Tomiyama, A. J. (2021). When ideology matters more than health: The influence of moral and identity-based motivations on meat consumption. Appetite, 164, 105277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105277

Rozin, P., Fischler, C., Shields-Argelès, C., & Rozin, A. (2021). Moralization and food: The cultural shaping of good and bad eating. Food, Culture & Society, 24(5), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2020.1862038

Ruby, M. B., Heine, S. J., & Kaplan, D. M. (2022). Meat, masculinity, and identity: Cultural resistance to plant-based diets. Appetite, 177, 106138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106138

Shaw, E., & Ives, C. D. (2023). Perceived naturalness and disgust as barriers to sustainable protein innovation: A cross-cultural study of Western consumers. Appetite, 182, 106453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106453

Siddiqui, S. A., Alvi, T., Sameen, A., Khan, S., Blinov, A. V., Nagdalian, A. A., Mehdizadeh, M., Adli, D. N., & Onwezen, M. C. (2022). Consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: A systematic review of current alternative protein sources and interventions adapted to increase their acceptability. Sustainability, 14(22), 15370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215370

Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2020). Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nature Food, 1(6), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x

Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Schmidt, U. J. (2017). Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: A review of influence factors. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5

Szejda, K., Urbanovich, T., & Bryant, C. (2023). Factors shaping global consumer acceptance of plant-based and cultivated meat: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1110432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1110432

Tan, H. S. G., Tibboel, C. J., & Stieger, M. (2022). Understanding disgust toward insect-based foods and cultured meat: The role of familiarity, attitudes, and cultural exposure. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 104406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104406

Taufik, D., Verain, M. C. D., Bouwman, E. P., & Reinders, M. J. (2019). Determinants of real-life behavioural interventions to reduce meat consumption: A review. Appetite, 142, 104347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104347

Vainio, A., Irz, X., & Hartikainen, H. (2021). How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing meat consumption? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appetite, 156, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104880

Verbeke, W., Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A., & de Barcellos, M. D. (2021). Communication strategies to reduce food neophobia and perceived risk in novel protein products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 112, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.009

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

Wilks, O. E., Hornsey, M. J., & Bloom, P. (2021). What does it mean to say that cultured meat is unnatural? Appetite, 156, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104960

• AI was used to polish the language