Integration of social responsibility in Lithuanian banks’ sustainability reports under the EU taxonomy framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63775/9q6mb131Keywords:
EU Taxonomy, Social Responsibility, CSR Disclosure, ESG Reporting, Social Dimension, banking, qualitative content analysisAbstract
In recent years, the EU Taxonomy has become a pivotal regulatory framework, aiming to direct financial flows towards environmentally and socially sustainable activities. This paper examines how Lithuanian banks integrate the social responsibility (S) dimension within the EU Taxonomy framework, focusing on disclosures in their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) or Sustainability reports. Using qualitative content analysis, the study reviews the 2023 reports of Artea, Citadele and Swedbank to evaluate the clarity and depth of social disclosures and their explicit links to EU Taxonomy requirements. Findings reveal that although banks acknowledge the significance of aligning with EU sustainability principles, the social dimension remains underdeveloped in Taxonomy-related sections. These results highlight the importance of systematically integrating social and environmental dimensions and ensuring that social responsibility data is both quantitative and verifiable. The study concludes that while there is progress in social responsibility reporting in Lithuanian banks, further efforts are needed to align fully with EU Taxonomy standards and enhance data-driven reporting practices. The paper contributes to ongoing discussions on strengthening CSR practices in the Lithuanian banking sector, highlighting current challenges and opportunities for improvement.
References
Čiegis, R., & Norkutė, R. (2012). Lietuvos bankų socialinė atsakomybė darnaus vystymosi kontekste. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, 2, 19-33.
Citadele Group. (2024). Sustainability report 2023.
Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66.
European Commission. (2018). Renewed sustainable finance strategy and implementation of the action plan on financing sustainable growth.
Garcia-Torea, N., Luque-Vílchez, M., & Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, P. (2024). The EU Taxonomy, sustainability reporting and financial institutions: Understanding the elements driving regulatory uncertainty. Accounting Forum, 48(3), 427-454.
Khan, H. U. Z., Halabi, A. K., & Samy, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: a study of selected banking companies in Bangladesh. Social responsibility journal, 5(3), 344-357.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Kuzmin, E., Mirzaev, B., & Alimov, U. (2024). Green Taxonomy for Sustainable Development. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 574, p. 00001). EDP Sciences.
Šiaulių Bankas. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2023.
Swedbank AB. (2024). Swedbank Annual and Sustainability Report 2023.
Tettamanzi, P., Gotti Tedeschi, R., & Murgolo, M. (2024). The European Union (EU) green taxonomy: Codifying sustainability to provide certainty to the markets. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 27111–27136.
Troje, D., & Gluch, P. (2020). Beyond policies and social washing: How social procurement unfolds in practice. Sustainability, 12(12), 4956.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dovilė Kudirkaitė (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.