From treaty abuse to tax integrity and sustainability: Swiss practices under OECD BEPS Action 6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63775/a0mfpf46Keywords:
tax sustainability, BEPS, treaty shopping, International Tax ReformAbstract
The sustainability of tax systems has emerged as a pressing challenge in the era of economic globalization and digitalization, where gaps in traditional tax rules facilitated Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). This article examines the relevance and impact of the OECD’s BEPS Action 6, with a focus on Switzerland’s implementation and practice. The research objective is to assess how Action 6 strengthens legal coherence, enhances economic substance requirements, and curbs treaty abuse, including treaty shopping. Using a doctrinal legal analysis of OECD instruments, Swiss legislative measures, and relevant case law, this study identifies practical trends in beneficial ownership tests, anti-abuse rules, and substance-based treaty entitlement. The findings indicate that Switzerland has integrated Action 6 standards through targeted treaty amendments and administrative practice, improving the alignment between taxation and genuine economic activity.
References
1) Decision Tribunal Fédéral 2A.239/2005 du 28 novembre 2005.
2) Decision 9C_635/2023 du Tribunal fédéral, published 4 November 2024.
3) EY (2023), Swiss BEPS 2.0 Pillar 2 Implementation, https://www.ey.com
4) Heitmüller F., Dealing with Treaty Shopping Across the Tax, Trade, and Investment Regimes, (2024).
5) Lawson B., Implementation of BEPS in Switzerland (2018), https://www.bonnard-lawson.com
6) Malek B., Le Principal Purpose Test (PPT) de l'Action BEPS n° 6 et l'abus des conventions de double imposition : impact pratique pour la Suisse, 2018, p. 8., https://www.oref.ch
7) Michael N. Kandev, Taj Kudhail, Sammy Cheaib, Marc Pietro Allard, John J. Lennard and Michael H. Lubetsky, Top Court Blesses Treaty-Shopping Arrangement: The Alta Energy Decision, 2021, https://www.dwpv.com
8) OECD-BEPS Measures In Swiss Double Tax Treaties - Impact Of The Principal Purpose Test (2018), https://www.mondaq.com
9) OECD (2015), Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6 Final Report.
10) OECD (2024), Prevention of Tax Treaty Abuse – Sixth Peer Review Report on Treaty Shopping: Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 6, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, https://www.oecd.org
11) OECD, Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS),
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/base-erosion-and-profit-shifting-beps.html
12) Oesterhelt S., Opel A. Les avantages conventionnels des Personal Holdings, 2021, www.steuerportal.ch
13) SIF (2024), Company taxation / BEPS, https://www.sif.admin.ch/en/company-taxation-beps
14) SIF (2024), Standards Minimaux, https://www.sif.admin.ch/fr/standards-minimaux-beps
15) The Queen v Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL, 2021 CSC 49
16) Tax Justice Network, 202, https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-axis-of-tax-avoidance_Tax-Justice-Network_April-2020-1.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruta Savignac (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.